I don't know much more than how to get a message to stay on top so far. I like what Gabby says.
On Oct 1, 6:00 pm, "pol.science kid" <[email protected]> wrote: > i havent had time to come and look for a month now i guess.... are we > reinventing ourselves?.... Is this a new ME..... as long as its ME..... > > > > > > > > > > On Sat, Oct 1, 2011 at 7:16 PM, gabbydott <[email protected]> wrote: > > A warm welcome is what I'd like to feel at the beginning. I would like to > > see this expressed in words of appreciation that I found it to the group and > > that I should look around to see if I'd like to stay and contribute to the > > group. I would like to see this expressed in an image that welcomes the > > colourfulness and diversity of each group member to the other. I would like > > to see my name and the group's name used in its openness towards individual > > interpretations - in its singular as well as its plural meaning, in its > > visibility as well as in its audibility. I would like to be informed about > > basic rules of interaction in a culture neutral, unbiased tone. I would > > behave accordingly. > > > I do not wish to get reinfected with horror vacui suppression. > > > On Sat, Oct 1, 2011 at 2:49 PM, Molly <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> I've reposted the Guidelines (Orn sent them to me.) Let's put the > >> little push pin to it and make it a top discussion (how is that > >> done?) Until we come up with new ones, having the ones we all know is > >> better than nothing. > > >> On Sep 30, 11:54 pm, archytas <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > I've taken down the two fixed messages at the head of discussions. > >> > They had lost relevance and the link wasn't working. We should really > >> > discuss what we want here as a group, so I'll invite suggestions > >> > here. I never got used to new google groups myself, but I guess we > >> > should think on that as well. > > >> > 1.I take it no one wants spam other than as a capital banning offence. > >> > 2. I'm much less concerned than rude words than most, but even I don't > >> > want to see them in personal attack or in torrents (boring). > >> > 3. Rules work best when they are tolerant. Manners often aren't. > > >> > So what would we want to see at the top of discussions? I hope we > >> > don't have to make a big deal out of it, but let's see. > > -- > EverComing
