Good to see you online Neil.. I was begining to wonder if I was going to
have to send out a rescue party due to all the flooding in England.
Allan

On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 11:11 AM, Allan H <[email protected]> wrote:

> I think people do dream about a perfect world..  I agree with you bill
> that people do not take death seriously and life after death is nothing
> more than a big joke..  If they took it seriously there would not be the
> greed problem there is today..
>
> Though I don't particularly believe in hell per-say I do believe in the
> great mandala and each person is creating their own heaven or hell based on
> how they respond to this world and the trials put forth..  Thanks to this
> group I had my beliefs evolve to the point that they are making more
> sense..  I think we as we live in this world are dual being operating both
> in the spiritual and physical world..  that has evolved to that we our
> souls are spiritual beings operating with in the human body vehicle trying
> to improve our social status (for lack of a better description) on the
> great mandala.
> As spiritual beings  we do already know the rules to the game..
> Allan
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 7:17 AM, William L Houts <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> I wonder if humans do dream of uncorrupted worlds, in general. You'd
>> think that would be universal, and it does seem to be borne out by Western
>> mythologies, with some exceptions.  For instance, the Greeks had Olympus,
>> but except for Heracles no one got to go there; everyone else went to
>> Hades, which was gloomy and boring if you were lucky enough to land there
>> in general population, and terrifying if the gods put you in Tartarus.  And
>> the Romans didn't seem to place faith in any sort of afterlife at all,
>> which is one of the main reasons whyChristianity sold like hotcakes.
>>  Eastern religions such as Buddhism had various hells and heavens, but they
>> were sort of besides the point:  your karma is / was supposed to boil down
>> to nothing and liberate you from the Wheel of Rebirth, which was supposed
>> to put you  in Nirvana, which was less a Heaven than it was a Nowhere. And
>> Taoism doesn't have much to say about heavenly afterworlds;  its whole
>> point is to make this world more just and balanced and leaves heavens to
>> the individual to figure out.
>>
>> But as to your question of whether humans long for uncorrupted worlds, I
>> think that besides the Abrahamic religions noone takes them very seriously.
>>  And I think they've got a point:  I mean, if you're taking your present
>> existence at all seriously, then just what is an afterlife supposed to be
>> about?  Are we supposed to be eating bonbons all day and living in some
>> version of American luxury?  I'd like to believe in Heaven  --which for me
>> looks like a kind of liberal college town, with libraries and funky old
>> cinema houses-- but all of that seems kind of empty if there's no gravitas,
>> no seriousness.   Without death, without a final marker which howls at us,
>> Do what you must do NOW and die knowing that you've used your life
>> well--without that, I think heaven would become kind of slouchy and boring,
>> or worse.  Unless, of course, what's waiting for us on the other side is
>> something superrational but beautiful, like being absorbed into the
>> godhead, if such there be.
>>
>> So in answer to your question, I think we do dream of uncorrupt worlds,
>> but if we examine them too closely, they tend to be bustable soap bubbles.
>> And maybe I lack imagination, but I wonder, how could it be any other way?
>>  Frankly, I'd like to be told how. I sound sensible about all of this if a
>> little pessimistic, but in reality I'm a scared ex-Catholic who is
>> terrified  of death and wants to solve the Big Question before they're
>> performing Last Rites on his sorry ass.
>>
>>
>> --Bill
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 9/27/2012 7:20 PM, rigsy03 wrote:
>>
>>> I wonder where you put the mythological and religious other-worldlies-
>>> from gods to guardian angels, etc.? Or the construct of Dante's
>>> "Divine Comedy", for instance. Do humans long for uncorrupted worlds?
>>>
>>> On Sep 27, 6:23 pm, William L Houts <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I'm with the pragmatists on the question of intelligent alien species.
>>>> Many scientists who speculate on this sort of thing --though there
>>>> really aren't that many of them-- say that such species wouldn't
>>>> resemble anything so comforting as a humanoid physiology, but I think
>>>> they're partly mistaken.  Surely there would be surprises in the way
>>>> nature cooks up life on other planets with radically different
>>>> chemistries than our dear old Mama Earth.  But I think there's reason to
>>>> suppose that many alien species would resemble us.  After all, any
>>>> species we might imagine has to cope with gravity as it evolves.  So
>>>> they're much more likely to evolve some form of locomotion which
>>>> involves  two, four or six pedal extremities (as Fats Waller calls them)
>>>> rather than three or five:  even-numbered legs are less wobbly and more
>>>> amenable to balanced movement which consumes fewer calories. . Also,
>>>> sense organs like eyes and ears are likely to be located in or close to
>>>> a head, as there is survival value in having sense organs located close
>>>> to a brain, or whatever such species might use for brains. Finally,
>>>> everyone in the cosmos requires energy to get going, so they're either
>>>> going to evolve photosynthesis and take their energy directly from their
>>>> sun or suns, or they're going to take their sunbeams indirectly by
>>>> consuming something lower in the food chain.  I'm sure there are lots of
>>>> evolution pathways I'm leaving out, seeing as I'm a curious poet rather
>>>> than a serious scientist type of guy, but I think these notions are, as
>>>> Allan named other ideas of mine, sensible provisos.
>>>>
>>>> PS.  I left out centipedes and millipedes with their scores of legs, but
>>>> I think y'all's get what I'm saying here.
>>>>
>>>> --Bill
>>>>
>>>> On 9/27/2012 3:57 PM, archytas wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>  I haven't seen any UFOs and tend not to be much interested in people
>>>>> who claim to have - at least without Bill's sensible provisos.  The
>>>>> speed of thought as a brain process is slower than light-speed - but
>>>>> then I'm basically a tropical fish realist.  I'd have a bet that no
>>>>> one in this group would really have much of a definition of light-
>>>>> speed and the Ricel curvature tensor, Euler Langrangian and the rest
>>>>> of Einstein's field equations.  I mean no offence and don't do much of
>>>>> this science myself.
>>>>> If you point out to a physicist that the people from the future who
>>>>> have invented the time machine are in extraordinarily short supply in
>>>>> our present he may come up with some mathematical guff on the shape of
>>>>> the universe that explains this or makes time travel only possible to
>>>>> the future.  I have seen demons - plodding back to camp after a week's
>>>>> endurance exercise with no food for two days I was visually convinced
>>>>> the sentries were vampires but still asked them where the Naffi was.
>>>>> My guess is that we travel through space as primitive life-forms with
>>>>> evolution built-in and waiting to unfold.  We may thus have come from
>>>>> a much more advanced civilisation than ours bound by the speed of
>>>>> light, capable of the biological engineering but not space-flight much
>>>>> more advanced than our own.  Calculations give 28 years as the time to
>>>>> reach the edge of the known universe - but this is the time inside the
>>>>> ship accelerating to near light speed fairly slowly.   Space is not
>>>>> friction free and it's doubtful we or our instruments could take the
>>>>> radiation of light-speed flight.
>>>>> I rather hope there are some nice, genuinely civilised aliens thinking
>>>>> of coming here.  In my speculation, intelligent life tends to worry
>>>>> about food chains led by apes as these have been notoriously war-like.
>>>>> I'm into bees and ants rather than UFOs at the moment.  Bees use
>>>>> 'pharma' to combat fungal infections.  Ants take slaves - killing the
>>>>> adults of another species and taking the larvae.  These slaves then
>>>>> raise the slaver brood.  Interestingly, the ant slaves rebel and kill
>>>>> the pupae of their masters - an act that does not favour the
>>>>> individuals a they will die, but does seem to be altruistic in favour
>>>>> of other colonies of the enslaved species.  I mention this to suggest
>>>>> science is not a human invention, just something in evolution we are
>>>>> expanding.
>>>>> UFOs remind me of religion generally - people seem to bond around
>>>>> ludic claims about golden salamanders and what cannot be proved.  I
>>>>> guess we will find life or past life-sign on Mars.  Salvation may come
>>>>> from a mother-ship, but my own feeling is that our inability to
>>>>> develop science as we could is a more important thought experiment.
>>>>> In respect of this problem I recommend 'Bad Pharma' by Ben
>>>>> Goldacre,     He finds a �600 billion industry in which more money is
>>>>>
>>>>> spent on marketing than on research and development, where the results
>>>>> of clinical trials of new drugs are massaged, and in which regulators
>>>>> fail to regulate. Papers supposedly by respected academics are
>>>>> ghostwritten by drug companies, and patients' pressure groups are
>>>>> covertly sponsored by pill manufacturers.
>>>>> I can't for the life of me work out why we aren't directing our
>>>>> collective towards tapping into the asteroid belt and beyond instead
>>>>> of ADMASS.
>>>>> On 24 Sep, 20:15, William L Houts <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm placing my bet on thoughtspeed.  It's a great concept and it's a
>>>>>> great word.  How could I do any better than that?
>>>>>> --Bill
>>>>>> On 9/24/2012 7:17 AM, Don Johnson wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I agree with Allan the distance challenge is daunting. In an endless
>>>>>>> universe there's also no doubt in my mind there are other inhabitable
>>>>>>> planets out there but very unlikely any "aliens" will be visiting us.
>>>>>>> But there is hope....
>>>>>>> http://www.npl.washington.edu/**av/altvw81.html<http://www.npl.washington.edu/av/altvw81.html>
>>>>>>> It's fun to speculate. The ball is in your court.
>>>>>>> dj
>>>>>>> On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 4:51 PM, William L Houts <[email protected]>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I've been around for a while now, so I thought I'd put in a topic
>>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>> discussion.  I'm very interested in the UFO phenomenon and wonder
>>>>>>>> what the
>>>>>>>> singing minds here have to say about it.  As for me, I don't have a
>>>>>>>> dog in
>>>>>>>> this fight --I tend to think that there's something to them,
>>>>>>>> something very
>>>>>>>> unusual, but I'm not at all certain that they're even piloted.
>>>>>>>>  Jacques
>>>>>>>> Valee, one of the more interesting theorists on the subject, says
>>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>>> they're something like external dreams.  Well, he doesn't say that
>>>>>>>> exactly,
>>>>>>>> but that's how I interpret him. Carl Jung, who was also very
>>>>>>>> interested in
>>>>>>>> the topic, says something very similar.
>>>>>>>> I have an experience to relate, too.  About fifteen or sixteen
>>>>>>>> years ago, I
>>>>>>>> was flying down to Las Vegas on Southwest.  Looking out of my
>>>>>>>> window I saw,
>>>>>>>> perhaps 20,000 feet below us, a disc-shaped object. It was
>>>>>>>> featureless and,
>>>>>>>> in the bright sun and from this angle, almost perfectly white.  It
>>>>>>>> wasn't
>>>>>>>> particularly fast and other than the fact that it was round, it
>>>>>>>> wasn't all
>>>>>>>> that interesting. I told my three travel mates, and they all
>>>>>>>> basically
>>>>>>>> called me a liar.  (I was very interested in occult topics in those
>>>>>>>> days, so
>>>>>>>> my judgment was highly suspect.)  I'm not convinced that it wasn't
>>>>>>>> something
>>>>>>>> like a military test craft or something like that, but it was a UFO
>>>>>>>> both in
>>>>>>>> the high woo woo sense and in the sense that it was an unfamiliar
>>>>>>>> flying
>>>>>>>> object.  Anyway, that's my story and I'm sticking to it.
>>>>>>>> Tennis, anyone?
>>>>>>>> --Bill
>>>>>>>> -- "I just flew in from the Land of the Dead and boy are my arms
>>>>>>>> tired."
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>> "I just flew in from the Land of the Dead
>>>>>>     and boy are my arms tired."
>>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>> "I just flew in from the Land of the Dead
>>>>    and boy are my arms tired."- Hide quoted text -
>>>>
>>>> - Show quoted text -
>>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>> "I just flew in from the Land of the Dead
>>  and boy are my arms tired."
>>
>> --
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
>  (
>   )
> |_D Allan
>
> Life is for moral, ethical and truthful living.
>
>
> I am a Natural Airgunner -
>
>  Full of Hot Air & Ready To Expel It Quickly.
>
>
>
>
>


-- 
 (
  )
|_D Allan

Life is for moral, ethical and truthful living.


I am a Natural Airgunner -

 Full of Hot Air & Ready To Expel It Quickly.

-- 



Reply via email to