Even if purposes are imposed upon individuals , the fact remains that
life has many purposes and not one.

On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 6:44 PM, rigs <[email protected]> wrote:
> Provided they actually have a choice- it is more likely to be imposed
> upon the individual. This is an interesting thought to pursue, RP.
>
> On Jan 23, 8:01 am, RP Singh <[email protected]> wrote:
>> There are many purposes in life and individuals choose the particular one
>> suitable to their nature , relevant to their times.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wednesday, January 23, 2013 5:36:29 PM UTC+5:30, Gabby wrote:
>>
>> > I would suggest to leave the dog owners with their sentiments just as much
>> > as the god-given with their purpose. How about saying the purpose of life
>> > and survival is to create meaning/make sense of it all? Or would that be a
>> > too counter-argumentative, unspecified, unobjectifiable, unproductive,
>> > circular, non-sensical approach?
>>
>> > 2013/1/23 RP Singh <[email protected] <javascript:>>
>>
>> >> If survival were the purpose for an individual , morality and
>> >> patriotism would make no sense.  In my opinion man is born without a
>> >> god-given purpose , and it is society which builds , develops and
>> >> inculcates a purpose in the individual. That would explain the
>> >> self-sacrificing deeds of great valor exhibited by many people.
>>
>> >> On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 6:48 PM, rigs <[email protected] <javascript:>>
>> >> wrote:
>> >> > We do not always know what impact lives have upon one another but I
>> >> > stand by my opinion that our primary purpose is to live/survive. As
>> >> > you know, Jesus made use of sinners- Romans fell on their swords in
>> >> > shame- early Christians earned sainthood- Islam distorts martyrdom as
>> >> > a war tactic.
>>
>> >> > On Jan 21, 10:25 am, RP Singh <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >> >> " To live. " As everyone , saint and sinner , lives that makes life
>> >> >> purposeless at least spiritually. If mere existing is the purpose then
>> >> >> howsoever you live is important and there is no use for martyrdom.
>>
>> >> >> On Monday, January 21, 2013 9:00:28 PM UTC+5:30, rigs wrote:
>>
>> >> >> > To live. How do we know the condition of their souls? Death teaches
>> >> >> > the rest of us that life is precious and brief.
>>
>> >> >> > On Jan 21, 8:03 am, RP Singh <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >> >> > > What you are saying , Andrew , is the spiritual lesson we take from
>> >> >> > > the experience of others , but what is the spiritual purpose for
>> >> that
>> >> >> > > child or for the old man ?
>>
>> >> >> > > On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 7:11 PM, andrew vecsey <
>> >> [email protected]>
>> >> >> > wrote:
>> >> >> > > > In suppose the spiritual purpose for the old man is to
>> >> experience the
>> >> >> > > > experience and to give the opportunity for others to react to
>> >> this
>> >> >> > > > experience. The spiritual purpose of the 1 year old is to
>> >> experience a
>> >> >> > very
>> >> >> > > > short life. The purpose of any life is to experience, learn and
>> >> teach.
>> >> >> > From
>> >> >> > > > the old man we can learn to be thankful of our own lives and
>> >> learn how
>> >> >> > to
>> >> >> > > > live it right to try to avoid having a stroke. From the 1 year
>> >> old we
>> >> >> > cam
>> >> >> > > > learn to be sympathetic and to ask questions that make us ponder
>> >> about
>> >> >> > the
>> >> >> > > > purpose of it all.
>>
>> >> >> > > > On Monday, January 21, 2013 1:31:34 PM UTC+1, RP Singh wrote:
>>
>> >> >> > > >> An old man suffers a stroke and becomes a vegetable for the
>> >> rest of
>> >> >> > his
>> >> >> > > >> life , a one year old child becomes sick and dies. What is the
>> >> >> > purpose , the
>> >> >> > > >> spiritual purpose for the old man or the child ?
>>
>> >> >> > > > --- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> >> >> > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> >> >> - Show quoted text -
>>
>> >> > --
>>
>> >> --- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> - Show quoted text -
>
> --
>
>
>

-- 



Reply via email to