Remarkable Edward - though the Gnostics went somewhat further. Respect is generally good, but I don't like to be threatened into it.
On 14 May, 18:09, Edward Mason <[email protected]> wrote: > In effort to begin where I left off, Archytas, it is a good thing that you > don't waste your time in search of any of the artifacts listed in any of > the first five books of the Torah, the first five books of the Old > Testament . These books were written as allegorical to simplify the Laws > inherent in reaching the formation of the triangle (Knowledge, Wisdom, and > Understanding). They describe the battle and the journey each individual > faces in that process. They also simplify the Spiritual Laws of ancient > Egypt from the more than 40 Laws to the 10, which were later broken down > again by Jesus to 2. > > As for the teachings of Jesus ( which was not his name), we should should > note that what we got as his teachings were instituted by Paul. Jesus spoke > in parables to all except his disciple, explicitly for the purpose that the > people would not get it. Then the disciple were either killed or exiled > within 70 years after Jesus left the scene and the writings which they left > were burned and forbidden. It should also be noted that Jesus told of this > theft in a parable where the keepers of the vineyard killed the son and > claimed his inheritance. Daniel also spoke of it when he mentioned > the Proclamation that would be set up which would defy The very Laws that > would elevate humanity; ( bring blood into the temple). > > To get more reasoning to this scenario one could compare Isaiah 6:9-13; and > Matthew 13:10-17; and 34:10. You will see one difference in Isaiah and > Matthew, where Isaiah said you go and blind them making them hard-hearted > and deft. But in Matthew these writers wrote as if the people done it to > themselves. This should not be surprising given the intentions involved. > > This would place us in our present state; in the furnish were we would be > purified by the flames of judgement. Our only hope is to attain the right > state in regard to the Laws regardless who or what we recognize as God, the > controlling forces of doing good or bad. It is not even necessary that one > believe in a god as long as they can arrive at a state where they recognize > and respect the powers of this force and the need to respect their fellow > man as himself. But somehow this is just too simple. Man tends to need it > more complicated or he is tempted by the benefits of keeping such knowledge > from the people. -- --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups ""Minds Eye"" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
