These governing Laws are really not a threat, per se. We retain choice in the matter. Like the laws of gravity, we can chose to leap from height with or without some apparatus which would prevent us from a violation thereof. So any teachings of their existence and how to survive in harmony with them is more of a favor than a threat or a command,
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 4:16 PM, archytas <[email protected]> wrote: > Remarkable Edward - though the Gnostics went somewhat further. > Respect is generally good, but I don't like to be threatened into it. > > On 14 May, 18:09, Edward Mason <[email protected]> wrote: > > In effort to begin where I left off, Archytas, it is a good thing that > you > > don't waste your time in search of any of the artifacts listed in any of > > the first five books of the Torah, the first five books of the Old > > Testament . These books were written as allegorical to simplify the Laws > > inherent in reaching the formation of the triangle (Knowledge, Wisdom, > and > > Understanding). They describe the battle and the journey each individual > > faces in that process. They also simplify the Spiritual Laws of ancient > > Egypt from the more than 40 Laws to the 10, which were later broken down > > again by Jesus to 2. > > > > As for the teachings of Jesus ( which was not his name), we should should > > note that what we got as his teachings were instituted by Paul. Jesus > spoke > > in parables to all except his disciple, explicitly for the purpose that > the > > people would not get it. Then the disciple were either killed or exiled > > within 70 years after Jesus left the scene and the writings which they > left > > were burned and forbidden. It should also be noted that Jesus told of > this > > theft in a parable where the keepers of the vineyard killed the son and > > claimed his inheritance. Daniel also spoke of it when he mentioned > > the Proclamation that would be set up which would defy The very Laws that > > would elevate humanity; ( bring blood into the temple). > > > > To get more reasoning to this scenario one could compare Isaiah 6:9-13; > and > > Matthew 13:10-17; and 34:10. You will see one difference in Isaiah and > > Matthew, where Isaiah said you go and blind them making them hard-hearted > > and deft. But in Matthew these writers wrote as if the people done it to > > themselves. This should not be surprising given the intentions involved. > > > > This would place us in our present state; in the furnish were we would be > > purified by the flames of judgement. Our only hope is to attain the right > > state in regard to the Laws regardless who or what we recognize as God, > the > > controlling forces of doing good or bad. It is not even necessary that > one > > believe in a god as long as they can arrive at a state where they > recognize > > and respect the powers of this force and the need to respect their fellow > > man as himself. But somehow this is just too simple. Man tends to need it > > more complicated or he is tempted by the benefits of keeping such > knowledge > > from the people. > > -- > > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > ""Minds Eye"" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > > > -- --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups ""Minds Eye"" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
