There might be some future in exploring the digital flows Andrew. 
 Perspectives might be a bit like programs or flow in thermo-dynamics - 
some pathways possible others not.  Allan's 'it is always your perspective' 
seems compellingly logical - but I suspect it cannot be (much logic spirals 
up its own place of special darkness).

I'm trying to write a story that seems relevant.  Two old cops are getting 
drunk and eating curry discussing an old child abuse case as they get on 
with a current one.  It's easy to keep this in the detective fiction genre, 
tough to explore the reality they cover up as they recognise detectives 
don't solve crimes.  They were, after all, "detectives" when all the CSE 
cover ups took place.  What was their role in that?  What shift in 
perspective has come now they are investigating both current abuse cases 
and the old cover up?  What was the real victim perspective?  Where is the 
perspective - in the individual or society or both?  Who or what didn't 
care as thousands of kids went through hell?  One might later wonder 
whether "spirituality" lets us avoid such reality - in this case the 
hard-boiled attitudes of the cops being the spirituality.

On Wednesday, January 28, 2015 at 11:25:33 AM UTC, andrew vecsey wrote:
>
> It is not as simple as a "yes" or "no". 
> It can be "yes" for my reality and "no" for yours. Or "yes" for in the 
> past and "no" for in the future and "maybe" for in the present moment. Or 
> "Yes" for here and "no" for there.. 
> Or "I don`t know" or "I don`t care" .  
>
> On Tuesday, January 27, 2015 at 3:29:43 PM UTC+1, Allan Heretic wrote:
>>
>> One needs to begin with what what is common. . Forgetting the d&d.  ¿Does 
>> God  exist in some form?  That is a yes or no question. Nothing more. 
>>
>

-- 

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
""Minds Eye"" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to