No Gabby, I rather like you. I see the circularity as coming back to intent and reaction. The lack of speed in argument is very frustrating, as are the ways we avoid difficult argument in favour of unexamined routines. We find it very easy to shoot the messenger for being subjective, perhaps in terms of stereotypes like 'men always speaking about themselves'. The extra somatic content of the position I put forward is vast and not to do with me other than that I have a personal position open to it. I would like to know how a speaker does not come back to herself without a dishonest feigning of objectivity, though to some extent all speech feigns a rationality compared with thought. In fact, many people have tried to explicate their personal positions and communicative action comes back to intentionality on mutual understanding. Part of that intention involves reciprocity on the explication of one's own thinking and feeling, and vulnerability. Could the circularity in your case be not knowing the wider debate and reliance on rendering the views of others as externalities to be slagged off as irrelevant to you?
On Friday, February 20, 2015 at 10:01:07 AM UTC, Gabby wrote: > > Whereas I don't think you are nasty. If the key for you is intentionality, > then I would say your intentions are good. It's not exactly my key, which > explains the deviant sound pattern interpretation. > Coming back to your question, I defined circular reasoning here as "not > leading anywhere, only referring back" to the speaker. > > Am Freitag, 20. Februar 2015 schrieb archytas : > >> More rhetoric Gabby. Your killing curiosity is not mine. Can you >> explain what circular reasoning is? You repeatedly come back to the rather >> nasty. >> >> On Friday, February 20, 2015 at 9:21:14 AM UTC, Gabby wrote: >>> >>> I need to hurry, before Allan wakes up and enters the scene .... >>> >>> What you are doing looks like circular reasoning to me, not leading >>> anywhere, only referring back to you. Demonstrating selected faith fossils >>> as proof how humans have killed curiosity does not make you look any less >>> zealot moron-like. That's the price you need to pay when your target market >>> is the points business. >>> >>> What do want here, Neil? Maybe we could help you to find you the right >>> peer group so you could get whe you want to get. >>> >> -- >> >> --- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the >> Google Groups ""Minds Eye"" group. >> To unsubscribe from this topic, visit >> https://groups.google.com/d/topic/minds-eye/yDzn3Mhp_8I/unsubscribe. >> To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to >> [email protected]. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> > -- --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups ""Minds Eye"" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
