"Google translate and similar do a fair job, but if you translate to German
and then back to English really significant nonsense comes out"

As is clearly demonstrated by the attached English translation. :D

And yet, I wonder how careful we would be with our words if we were
consciously aware they always had to be fed through a translator to reach
someone else. And then I wonder why we don't realize that they already are,
even when we're speaking in the same "Mother Tongue" (I love how that
translated).

On Sat, Feb 28, 2015 at 9:33 PM, archytas <[email protected]> wrote:

> The German sounds somewhat more hostile than the translation Chris.
> There's some work on how tone of voice affects decision.  Argument content
> rarely does well. Voice to text converters I've tried always fail (slightly
> better if grandpa leaves his teeth in).  We do know bilingual (and multi)
> brains work differently than those with only one language.  And little AI
> programmes outperform us on old arcade games and most of us at chess.
>
> When it comes to talking to machines, natural language has been a pisser -
> though I hear claims we may be getting round this.  Google translate and
> similar do a fair job, but if you translate to German and then back to
> English really significant nonsense comes out.  Spoken language is
> noise-ridden, and even then maybe only ten percent of what humans
> communicate face to face.
>
> Though we like to think picking up on nuance and emotion is smart, this
> may be very misguided - especially as we are so easily conned by liars,
> psychopaths and narcissists.  Psychos do three times better with parole
> boards than ordinary criminals, suggesting something is lost in translation
> by worthies on parole boards.  My daughters were even more successful with
> me.
>
> We have machines working on Identifying sickos and psychos based on
> language (text) use. The basic idea is to place some text from obvious to
> sickos, identify Which words, phrases, syntax and so on They use, then
> program the machine to spot them. We are doing something similar with
> facial recognition and gait analysis. The way we walk is like a
> fingerprint.
>
> In emotional intelligence tests we find a lot of smart people (and dumb
> ones) do not get facial expressions as They are supposed to. Having seen
> many smiling assassins I'm not sure who is getting this wrong.
>
> I'd Probably want to examine presuppositions on the bit lost in
> translation from the perspective did natural language is not as smart as we
> think anyway and May have a prime directive of confusion and deceit. And
> I miss Francis too.
>
>
>
> On Sunday, March 1, 2015 at 12:56:27 AM UTC Chris Jenkins wrote:
>>
>> What if the only way we could communicate was not understood by other
>> software capable of emotions? Digital communication not convey tone now,
>> imagine if they also lost nuance in translation?
>>
>> I'm thinking about this because I have the conversations in this group
>> often break into two people together to talk over. I wonder if the other
>> speakers understand at all. If our words not only lost her tone, but
>> also their native dialect; if it was something even the speaker does not
>> understand before they can receive from another person, we would be able to
>> communicate at all?
>>
>> I wish Francisco were here to weigh; he would have insight I'd valuable
>> as a native English speaker who has spent so much time in a country with a
>> language other than their mother tongue to find. Gabby has been similar
>> insight, how much time she spends in English with us, (and how many times
>> have I asked if I missed a sense in translation), but I guess they are
>> usually only fun poorly translated make my German , : D
>>
>  --
>
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> ""Minds Eye"" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
""Minds Eye"" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to