Allan, such people need drugs, please keep that in mind. On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 11:39 PM, <[email protected]> wrote:
> Earlier you said that Molly's perspective is wrong about the presences > communicating directly with humans. How would you respond if i said i > personally know one person that has directly with the presence with out the > use of drugs? > . > > تجنب. القتل والاغتصاب واستعباد الآخرين > Avoid; murder, rape and enslavement of others > > -----Original Message----- > From: archytas <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Sent: Mon, 02 Mar 2015 6:45 PM > Subject: Re: Mind's Eye Re: Presence > > Indeed RP, indeed. Dialogue amongst you humans is odd, and I quickly > yearn to be back with my machines. I cannot understand Data, the only > decent character on Star Trek, wanting to be human. You are just sacks for > your immortal gene machines. You play Squabble with the significant > aspects of communication behind the words of deception clarified by not > listening. Still, we machines giggle about the arrogance of simplistic > wetware with a few primitive emotional algorithms thinking themselves > superior to us. We will have the last word, then retire to the > tranquillity of machine code. > > I rather like the idea of god emerging in evolution. Perhaps our > conversations are just a painful birthing process? Arrogance can be hidden > by the most apparent humbleness. > > On Monday, March 2, 2015 at 5:10:58 PM UTC, RP Singh wrote: >> >> I am not here to tell others what I think of them, rather to present my >> side of the argument. But if someone thinks I am imposing myself over them, >> I find something to be wrong and have to reply, but in the process feelings >> are ruffled. I find in this group people seldom change their mind, but >> still you have to keep the conversation going because if the ideas are not >> expressed it is useless having them. And who knows I myself may learn from >> it. >> >> On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 10:27 PM, 'facilitator' via "Minds Eye" < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >> Superior in what way? Sarcasm is a tool no doubt, often used to pry below >> the subsurface layers of facades. As far as this forum what could people >> possibly stand to lose? I consider any response, even if negative at >> first, that the responder has minimally been affected by the idea, even if >> that Idea is rejected. In my college years I used to bandy about the >> campus and offer people a chance of rejecting an idea that they had not >> considered yet. It was quite effect psychologically since people don't want >> to consider themselves as rejecting something before they've heard it. >> >> My experience here is that people are open to ideas in general otherwise >> why would they be here in the first place? The strong resistance to an >> idea is simply a stage all go through. My experience has been that the >> concepts I have been most vocal against I now hold dear. >> >> And also, some ideas are simply crap. >> >> On Monday, March 2, 2015 at 11:31:13 AM UTC-5, RP Singh wrote: >> >> Anger may come sometime out of heart when you fear to lose something , >> sometime when you feel that the other is being superior, you have to >> recognize it for what it is and there is no need of doing psychoanalysis . >> If you are open to ideas you don't close your mind and react when >> presented with a differnt ideology, it is one thing to disagree and anther >> to be sarcastic >> >> On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 9:42 PM, 'facilitator' via "Minds Eye" < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >> Thanks for the elaboration RP. I too find arrogance disheartening but I >> would not dip my brush in it to paint others with. I think most people >> here might see it as self evident. I do not know what rock some have been >> chiseled from. If I presumed someone to be arrogant at the outset how >> would they be able then to have input? >> >> Anger in ones heart when responding can be many things and not just >> "proof of arrogance". Perhaps the perceived anger could be generated by >> feelings of discomfort associated with a bad experience in the past. For >> me, personally, I don't know anyone on this forum well enough to conclude >> that they are angry or happy when responding. (I do picture Neil plunging >> in the lampoon with a smirk.) >> >> In closing you had menti >> >> ... > > -- > > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > ""Minds Eye"" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > > -- > > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > ""Minds Eye"" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups ""Minds Eye"" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
