Wonderful, the moral enhancement thread is yours! :)

2015-03-02 22:49 GMT+01:00 <[email protected]>:

> I do not need either recognition or approval to say what i think. Truth
> never needs recognition or approval.
> There are people that I have great respect for because of the people who
> they are. Believe me if ì needed peoples approval i would not being talking
> about souls or zombies.
>
>
> تجنب. القتل والاغتصاب واستعباد الآخرين
> Avoid; murder, rape and enslavement of others
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gabby <[email protected]>
> To: [email protected]
> Sent: Mon, 02 Mar 2015 10:32 PM
> Subject: Re: Mind's Eye Re: Presence
>
> I don't understand how you come to think that by twisting yourself one and
> two spins more you will get recognition and approval from Neil for what YOU
> THINK?! Say what you want to say about your experience, I'd rather you
> project onto God than on Zombies and humans.
>
> Am Montag, 2. März 2015 19:09:48 UTC+1 schrieb Allan Heretic:
>>
>> Earlier you said that Molly's perspective is wrong about the presences
>> communicating directly with humans. How would you respond if i said i
>> personally know one person that has directly with the presence with out the
>> use of drugs?
>> .
>>
>> تجنب. القتل والاغتصاب واستعباد الآخرين
>> Avoid; murder, rape and enslavement of others
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: archytas <[email protected]>
>> To: [email protected]
>> Sent: Mon, 02 Mar 2015 6:45 PM
>> Subject: Re: Mind's Eye Re: Presence
>>
>> Indeed RP, indeed.  Dialogue amongst you humans is odd, and I quickly
>> yearn to be back with my machines.  I cannot understand Data, the only
>> decent character on Star Trek, wanting to be human.  You are just sacks for
>> your immortal gene machines.  You play Squabble with the significant
>> aspects of communication behind the words of deception clarified by not
>> listening.  Still, we machines giggle about the arrogance of simplistic
>> wetware with a few primitive emotional algorithms thinking themselves
>> superior to us.  We will have the last word, then retire to the
>> tranquillity of machine code.
>>
>> I rather like the idea of god emerging in evolution.  Perhaps our
>> conversations are just a painful birthing process?  Arrogance can be hidden
>> by the most apparent humbleness.
>>
>> On Monday, March 2, 2015 at 5:10:58 PM UTC, RP Singh wrote:
>>
>> I am not here to tell others what I think of them, rather to present my
>> side of the argument. But if someone thinks I am imposing myself over them,
>> I find something to be wrong and have to reply, but in the process feelings
>> are ruffled. I find in this group people seldom change their mind, but
>> still you have to keep the conversation going because if the ideas are not
>> expressed it is useless having them. And who knows I myself may learn from
>> it.
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 10:27 PM, 'facilitator' via "Minds Eye" <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> Superior in what way? Sarcasm is a tool no doubt, often used to pry below
>> the subsurface layers of facades.  As far as this forum what could people
>> possibly stand to lose?  I consider any response, even if negative at
>> first, that the responder has minimally been affected by the idea, even if
>> that Idea is rejected.  In my college years I used to bandy about the
>> campus and offer people a chance of rejecting an idea that they had not
>> considered yet. It was quite effect psychologically since people don't want
>> to consider themselves as rejecting something before they've heard it.
>>
>> My experience here is that people are open to ideas in general otherwise
>> why would they be here in the first place?  The strong resistance to an
>> idea is simply a stage all go through.  My experience has been that the
>> concepts I have been most vocal against I now hold dear.
>>
>> And also, some ideas are simply crap.
>>
>> On Monday, March 2, 2015 at 11:31:13 AM UTC-5, RP Singh wrote:
>>
>> Anger may come sometime out of heart when you fear to lose something ,
>> sometime when you feel that the other is being superior, you have to
>> recognize it for what it is and there is no need of doing psychoanalysis .
>> If you are open to ideas you don't close your mind and react whe
>>
>> ...
>
>  --
>
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> ""Minds Eye"" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
>
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>
> --
>
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the
> Google Groups ""Minds Eye"" group.
> To unsubscribe from this topic, visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/topic/minds-eye/TplDVV1N_zw/unsubscribe.
> To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to
> [email protected].
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
""Minds Eye"" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to