I do realize how much time and energy you spend on translating other peoples words for me. I do appreciate the good intentions, but would kindly ask you to reflect upon the light that this sheds on those, whose original words are pushed in the shadow. I think we should all have the right to think and speak for ourselves in our original words! Speak up, people!
Am Donnerstag, 12. März 2015 03:40:45 UTC+1 schrieb archytas: > > Ah Hope! What an imagined blessing to us all you are. > > Molly has written fairly extensively on imagination, including such as a > coming transparent world, an old religious theme she handles much better > than some famous texts (More, Bentham) and without grim fundamentalist > overtones of a promotion of virtue and prevention of vice squad. One could > start in Hope's lovely circles of all being imagination in an imagination > world - the modal logic view of David Lewis and Nelson Goodman on ,many > possible worlds. I'm sure Hope will give us a long treatise on this now > Gabby isn't about to bully everyone and Allan has been castigated and is > trying to be a good boy. There does seem something of a flaw in the many > world Hope hypothesis, as every possible world Hope is in contains > Gabby-bullying questions. This is remarkably dull and unimaginative. > > -- --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups ""Minds Eye"" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
