On 10/30/2011 18:46, Ozkan Sezer wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 12:40 PM, Ruben Van Boxem
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> [...]
>>>> - the change around 20110827 for 9x/me/2000 compatibility, such as
>>>>
>>>> https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=3300841&group_id=202880&atid=983354
>>>> curious if this is a compiler I can use to build windows 9x apps.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Yes, it should provide compatibility for codepage functions
>>
>> Is this anything non-standard? Would my toolchain builds be missing this
>> because I missed a configure option?
> 
> That change avoids the use of an undocumented msvcrt symbol
> which is not available in older versions of the dll and is not guaranteed
> to be available in newer versions, either).  If you use crt revisions after
> that change, you are just fine.
> 

IIRC there is no foolproof way to deal with this issue, libmsvcr100.a
only has the __lc_codepage_func version, no __lc_codepage, so that goes
both ways if you want to link to msvcrXX instead of msvcrt.

Anybody know if GetProcAddress works on data exports?

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Get your Android app more play: Bring it to the BlackBerry PlayBook 
in minutes. BlackBerry App World&#153; now supports Android&#153; Apps 
for the BlackBerry&reg; PlayBook&#153;. Discover just how easy and simple 
it is! http://p.sf.net/sfu/android-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Mingw-w64-public mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public

Reply via email to