2011/10/30 JonY <[email protected]>:
> On 10/30/2011 18:46, Ozkan Sezer wrote:
>> On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 12:40 PM, Ruben Van Boxem
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> [...]
>>>>> - the change around 20110827 for 9x/me/2000 compatibility, such as
>>>>>
>>>>> https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=3300841&group_id=202880&atid=983354
>>>>> curious if this is a compiler I can use to build windows 9x apps.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Yes, it should provide compatibility for codepage functions
>>>
>>> Is this anything non-standard? Would my toolchain builds be missing this
>>> because I missed a configure option?
>>
>> That change avoids the use of an undocumented msvcrt symbol
>> which is not available in older versions of the dll and is not guaranteed
>> to be available in newer versions, either).  If you use crt revisions after
>> that change, you are just fine.
>>
>
> IIRC there is no foolproof way to deal with this issue, libmsvcr100.a
> only has the __lc_codepage_func version, no __lc_codepage, so that goes
> both ways if you want to link to msvcrXX instead of msvcrt.
>
> Anybody know if GetProcAddress works on data exports?

Sure, it does.

Kai

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Get your Android app more play: Bring it to the BlackBerry PlayBook 
in minutes. BlackBerry App World&#153; now supports Android&#153; Apps 
for the BlackBerry&reg; PlayBook&#153;. Discover just how easy and simple 
it is! http://p.sf.net/sfu/android-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Mingw-w64-public mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public

Reply via email to