On 11/8/2011 17:26, Ozkan Sezer wrote: > On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 10:39 AM, Mark Dootson <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I have been trying to compile binutils natively using >> mingw-w64-stable-2.x-r4587. Original release 2.0 worked OK. After much >> hair pulling, I realised the answer was the binutils code doesn't yet >> cope with availability of _FILE_OFFEST_BITS on mingw so I just pass >> --disable-largefile to configure. >> >> During the hair pulling I tried to follow the recent changes applied to >> stable around large file support and time. >> >> Does the following patch from JonY, originally added as r4540, need >> reapplying? It's absence causes no problems for me - but it looks like >> it should be there. > > That patch has not been reverted from v2.x, it is there. > If you reverted it on your own copies, we'd like to know > what problems it caused for you. >
IIRC it has been fixed in binutils CVS HEAD recently, binutils was forward declaring its own stat structure.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ RSA(R) Conference 2012 Save $700 by Nov 18 Register now http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1
_______________________________________________ Mingw-w64-public mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public
