On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 11:19 AM, Kai Tietz <[email protected]> wrote: > 2012/1/11 Ozkan Sezer <[email protected]>: >> On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 11:02 AM, Kai Tietz <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Hmm, >>> >>> I assume this issue is caused by current 2.0 branch. It would be >>> really good if Ozkan could catch-up the stdio/wchar fixes from trunk >>> for it. >> >> why do this happens at all which had never happened >> before: nixman: is this with v2.0x branch crt/headers >> or with the trunk? > > Well, I changed on trunk scope for function being static unused. This > fixes that issue, as for force-inline we lack a function-pointer, > which is used by some projects.
I see, Can you provide some pointers as to which revisions, etc needs applying to stable branches: I'm a bit behind these days > Btw I added same forwarder mechanism > to vsnprintf/snprintf in trunk. Additionally I checked in yesterday a > fix for XP's msvcrt without vsnprintf export by forwarding it to > _vsnprintf. This forwarding causes the requirement to have binutils > with '==' directive support in .def files. Last recent binutils > releases should already provide this feature. > We never had (v)snprintf exports without the leading underscore in the stable branches's def files, so this is a trunk thing: should I add them to the stable branches? > >>> >>> Kai >>> >>> 2012/1/11 niXman <[email protected]>: >>>> Hi list! >>>> >>>> At the next build of MinGW encountered this error: >>>> E:/msys/local/lib/libcloog-isl.a(libcloog_isl_la-domain.o):domain.c:(.text+0x1088): >>>> undefined reference to `snprintf' >> [snip] >> >> I wonder: if libcloog is using snprintf() and not _snprintf(), >> why are they not fixing it and we are tearing ourselves apart? >> Are they aware of the issues? > > I would assume so, and I assume also they won't take care about it > pretty much as snprintf is POSIX style. I admit it would be better if > people would use the leading-underscore variant instead, but well ... > > Kai The issue reporter should at least notify them. -- O.S. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Ridiculously easy VDI. With Citrix VDI-in-a-Box, you don't need a complex infrastructure or vast IT resources to deliver seamless, secure access to virtual desktops. With this all-in-one solution, easily deploy virtual desktops for less than the cost of PCs and save 60% on VDI infrastructure costs. Try it free! http://p.sf.net/sfu/Citrix-VDIinabox _______________________________________________ Mingw-w64-public mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public
