2012/1/11 Ozkan Sezer <[email protected]>:
> On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 11:19 AM, Kai Tietz <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 2012/1/11 Ozkan Sezer <[email protected]>:
>>> On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 11:02 AM, Kai Tietz <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> Hmm,
>>>>
>>>> I assume this issue is caused by current 2.0 branch. It would be
>>>> really good if Ozkan could catch-up the stdio/wchar fixes from trunk
>>>> for it.
>>>
>>> why do this happens at all which had never happened
>>> before: nixman:  is this with v2.0x branch crt/headers
>>> or with the trunk?
>>
>> Well, I changed on trunk scope for function being static unused.  This
>> fixes that issue, as for force-inline we lack a function-pointer,
>> which is used by some projects.
>
> I see,
>
> Can you provide some pointers as to which revisions, etc
> needs applying to stable branches:  I'm a bit behind these
> days
>
>>   Btw I added same forwarder mechanism
>> to vsnprintf/snprintf in trunk.  Additionally I checked in yesterday a
>> fix for XP's msvcrt without vsnprintf export by forwarding it to
>> _vsnprintf.  This forwarding causes the requirement to have binutils
>> with '==' directive support in .def files.  Last recent binutils
>> releases should already provide this feature.
>>
>
> We never had (v)snprintf exports without the leading
> underscore in the stable branches's def files, so this is
> a trunk thing:  should I add them to the stable branches?
>
>>
>>>>
>>>> Kai
>>>>
>>>> 2012/1/11 niXman <[email protected]>:
>>>>> Hi list!
>>>>>
>>>>> At the next build of MinGW encountered this error:
>>>>> E:/msys/local/lib/libcloog-isl.a(libcloog_isl_la-domain.o):domain.c:(.text+0x1088):
>>>>> undefined reference to `snprintf'
>>> [snip]
>>>
>>> I wonder: if libcloog is using snprintf() and not _snprintf(),
>>> why are they not fixing it and we are tearing ourselves apart?
>>> Are they aware of the issues?
>>
>> I would assume so, and I assume also they won't take care about it
>> pretty much as snprintf is POSIX style.  I admit it would be better if
>> people would use the leading-underscore variant instead, but well ...
>>
>> Kai
>
> The issue reporter should at least notify them.
I.e. I have to send them information about this bug?
In what form?

>
> --
> O.S.
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Ridiculously easy VDI. With Citrix VDI-in-a-Box, you don't need a complex
> infrastructure or vast IT resources to deliver seamless, secure access to
> virtual desktops. With this all-in-one solution, easily deploy virtual
> desktops for less than the cost of PCs and save 60% on VDI infrastructure
> costs. Try it free! http://p.sf.net/sfu/Citrix-VDIinabox
> _______________________________________________
> Mingw-w64-public mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ridiculously easy VDI. With Citrix VDI-in-a-Box, you don't need a complex
infrastructure or vast IT resources to deliver seamless, secure access to
virtual desktops. With this all-in-one solution, easily deploy virtual 
desktops for less than the cost of PCs and save 60% on VDI infrastructure 
costs. Try it free! http://p.sf.net/sfu/Citrix-VDIinabox
_______________________________________________
Mingw-w64-public mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public

Reply via email to