2012/9/28 Koehne Kai <[email protected]>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: ext Ruben Van Boxem [mailto:[email protected]]
> > Sent: Friday, September 28, 2012 11:47 AM
> > To: [email protected]
> > Subject: Re: [Mingw-w64-public] Problem with mingw32-make and long
> > commands (x86_64-w64-mingw32-gcc-4.7.2-release-win64_rubenvb)
> >
> > 2012/9/28 Koehne Kai <[email protected]>
> >
> >
> > Hi Ruben,
> >
> > I ran into an issue with your mingw32-make and a really long
> > compiler line: http://pastebin.com/h5tNV7x5 . We're obviously hitting a
> > buffer limit here ... However, if I replace your mingw32-make
> >
> > GNU Make 3.82
> > Built for x86_64-w64-mingw32
> >
> > With the one from latest mingw-builds:
> >
> > GNU Make 3.82.90
> > Built for x86_64-w64-mingw32
> >
> > The compilation succeeds.
> >
> >
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I know my mingw32-make builds are flawed :( I haven't been able to build
> it
> > from cvs directly (there's cvs "dead" files that are needed by
> autoconf), and
> > there seem to be no svn or git mirrors that are any more decent or
> usable.
> >
> > Could you please try the "official" mingw-w64 make (which is just an old
> cvs
> > checkout with I believe upstream patches) from here:
> > http://sourceforge.net/projects/mingw-
> > w64/files/External%20binary%20packages%20%28Win64%20hosted%29/m
> > ake/make-3.82.90-20111115.zip/download
>
> It's not only your build: Neither the one you linked to, nor the one from
> mingw-32, nor the one from latest mingw-tdm handle this gracefully. Only
> mingw-builds does .
>
That's interesting. I'll check out mingw-builds' patches.
> > I have taken this source+patches since my 4.8-seh build and if this
> fixes the
> > problem, that would be great. Otherwise I'd have to go hunting for other
> > patches or a decent current snapshot of mingw32-make.
> >
> > On a sidenote, I've had great success using Qt's jom.exe even for MinGW
> > makefiles. It allows for unseen parallellism in a Qt build. Perhaps it
> is worth
> > looking into solidifying its MinGW makefile support in the near future.
> I am
> > all for leaving mingw32-make behind. It's old and unnecessarily slow.
>
> Actually I didn't know that jom is capable of using GNU makefiles at all
> until last week or so ;) But it's limited to the subset of Makefile
> constructs qmake generates. I expect that it'll break easily for other
> Makefiles ...
>
True, but at least all CMake generated Makefiles work great as well. Maybe
you could push for better MinGW support in jom ;-).
I'll try to get a complete CVS GNU make checkout. Anyone on the list know
how to resurrect dead files from a CVS repo? Or if there is a good svn
mirror, or perhaps a near-complete GNU make clone other than jom?
Thanks,
Ruben
>
> Regards
>
> Kai
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Got visibility?
> Most devs has no idea what their production app looks like.
> Find out how fast your code is with AppDynamics Lite.
> http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;262219671;13503038;y?
> http://info.appdynamics.com/FreeJavaPerformanceDownload.html
> _______________________________________________
> Mingw-w64-public mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Got visibility?
Most devs has no idea what their production app looks like.
Find out how fast your code is with AppDynamics Lite.
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;262219671;13503038;y?
http://info.appdynamics.com/FreeJavaPerformanceDownload.html
_______________________________________________
Mingw-w64-public mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public
