On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 11:17 AM, Ruben Van Boxem wrote:
>
> That's interesting. I'll check out mingw-builds' patches.
>
--8<--
>
> True, but at least all CMake generated Makefiles work great as well. Maybe
> you could push for better MinGW support in jom ;-).
>
> I'll try to get a complete CVS GNU make checkout. Anyone on the list know
> how to resurrect dead files from a CVS repo? Or if there is a good svn
> mirror, or perhaps a near-complete GNU make clone other than jom?

Here is an interesting thread
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/make-w32/2012-05/msg00000.html which
is the patch niXman used for mingw-builds.

-- 
Earnie
-- https://sites.google.com/site/earnieboyd

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Got visibility?
Most devs has no idea what their production app looks like.
Find out how fast your code is with AppDynamics Lite.
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;262219671;13503038;y?
http://info.appdynamics.com/FreeJavaPerformanceDownload.html
_______________________________________________
Mingw-w64-public mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public

Reply via email to