On 3/14/13 8:00 PM, NightStrike wrote: > Pretty much nobody uses the top level configure. It > was an idea that I had that nobody really wanted, and so it fell into > disuse and doesn't really work (which I guess is what you are seeing).
Personally I like the idea of top level configure, *but* the fact that it doesn't work is a reason I use it. Ideally, the scenario: ./configure make install-headers # ... GCC stuff ... make make install would be much cleaner than current solution IMHO. And it this scenario, Corinna's proposal to use in-tree headers seems a very much expected behavior. > If you want top level configure to work again, give me some time and > I'll work on it to make it useful. There's actually numerous problems > with it, not just the hokiness of trying to stage a headers install. Yes, please :) Cheers, Jacek ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics Download AppDynamics Lite for free today: http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_mar _______________________________________________ Mingw-w64-public mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public
