> Point 3 should not force none-inline version. Please expain why you > think that is required.
While I removed the inline asm from these 3 routines, the routines themselves are still __CRT_INLINE. And the routines they call are either __CRT_INLINE or __MINGW_INTRIN_INLINE. If you examine the output generated, you'll see these routines still only generate a single line of asm code. Hard to get more efficient than that. If I weren't changing them to call existing routines, I'd still have to change the asm. As written, they don't support -masm=intel (one of my goals). Rather than duplicate the inline asm from elsewhere, calling existing routines seemed the more sensible plan. I might also point out that #3 only affects x86 code. The x64 code already does it this way. I'll wait for your final approval before committing. dw ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ See everything from the browser to the database with AppDynamics Get end-to-end visibility with application monitoring from AppDynamics Isolate bottlenecks and diagnose root cause in seconds. Start your free trial of AppDynamics Pro today! http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48808831&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Mingw-w64-public mailing list Mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public
