Hi, Ruben!

Mingw-builds toolchains already has this patches for a long time applied to
GCC.

Regards,
Alexey.


2013/9/20 Ruben Van Boxem <[email protected]>

> Hi,
>
> I was asked by a user of my Arch User Repository packages about the
> necessity of this patch:
>
> http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/mingw-gcc.git/tree/gcc-make-xmmintrin-header-cplusplus-compatible.patch
>
> And it makes me wonder about this patch as well:
>
> http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/mingw-gcc.git/tree/gcc-bug-56742-seh-uncaught-throw.patch
>
> This would relate only to GCC 4.8.1 and the final release of MinGW-w64 v3.
> It would seem necessary for Qt 5.
>
> Thanks for any info,
>
> Ruben
>
>
> 2013/9/20 Erik van Pienbroek <[email protected]>
>
>> JonY schreef op vr 20-09-2013 om 06:24 [+0800]:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > Thanks to all contributors, especially to Erik for running build tests,
>> > v3 is now nearly stable.
>> >
>> > The is only 1 known issue left. one lh_mouse has discovered a bug in
>> > remquol(). He is taking uncomfortably long to fix it, I'm not happy over
>> > the inactivity in SVN.
>> >
>> > Anyway, here's RC1. Note to developers v3 has branched.
>> >
>> > <
>> http://sourceforge.net/projects/mingw-w64/files/mingw-w64/mingw-w64-testing/mingw-w64-v3.0rc1.tar.bz2/download
>> >
>>
>> Hey Jon,
>>
>> Thanks for the RC tarball. I'll push it to Fedora 20 (Alpha) and also
>> enable winpthreads at the same time. One question about the versioning
>> though: previous mingw-w64 releases used 3 digits in their version
>> number (for example: 2.0.8). The RC you mentioned now only contains 2
>> digits (3.0rc1). There may be some Linux distributions and packaging
>> mechanisms around which may consider '3.0' to be older than '2.0.8' due
>> to the fact that the number of digits changed. For RPM based Linux
>> distributions this change in version numbering works fine:
>>
>> $ rpmdev-vercmp
>>   Epoch1:
>> Version1: 2.0.8
>> Release1: 1
>>   Epoch2:
>> Version2: 3.0
>> Release2: 0.rc1
>> 2.0.8-1 < 3.0-0.rc1
>>
>> $ rpmdev-vercmp
>>   Epoch1:
>> Version1: 2.0.8
>> Release1: 1
>>   Epoch2:
>> Version2: 3.0rc1
>> Release2: 1
>> 2.0.8-1 < 3.0rc1-1
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Erik
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> LIMITED TIME SALE - Full Year of Microsoft Training For Just $49.99!
>> 1,500+ hours of tutorials including VisualStudio 2012, Windows 8,
>> SharePoint
>> 2013, SQL 2012, MVC 4, more. BEST VALUE: New Multi-Library Power Pack
>> includes
>> Mobile, Cloud, Java, and UX Design. Lowest price ever! Ends 9/20/13.
>>
>> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=58041151&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
>> _______________________________________________
>> Mingw-w64-public mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public
>>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> LIMITED TIME SALE - Full Year of Microsoft Training For Just $49.99!
> 1,500+ hours of tutorials including VisualStudio 2012, Windows 8,
> SharePoint
> 2013, SQL 2012, MVC 4, more. BEST VALUE: New Multi-Library Power Pack
> includes
> Mobile, Cloud, Java, and UX Design. Lowest price ever! Ends 9/20/13.
> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=58041151&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
> _______________________________________________
> Mingw-w64-public mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
LIMITED TIME SALE - Full Year of Microsoft Training For Just $49.99!
1,500+ hours of tutorials including VisualStudio 2012, Windows 8, SharePoint
2013, SQL 2012, MVC 4, more. BEST VALUE: New Multi-Library Power Pack includes
Mobile, Cloud, Java, and UX Design. Lowest price ever! Ends 9/20/13. 
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=58041151&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Mingw-w64-public mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public

Reply via email to