2014-05-06 15:33 GMT+02:00 LRN <[email protected]>: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 06.05.2014 17:26, Kai Tietz wrote: >> 2014-05-06 15:01 GMT+02:00 LRN: >>> >>> subj is attached >> >> Patch is of course ok. I just wanted a note on mailing-list that you've >> update to current (which version?). > OpenGL 4.4, i think. > > In my RSS feed there's an entry about OpenGL 4.4 dated 2014.03.20, and one of > the headers is dated 2014.03.19. And http://www.opengl.org/registry/ says 4.4 > as well. > >> I think in future this is enough for an merge from upstream. > > Elaborate on that, please. Do you mean that i just need to post a note to the > ML saying that i'm updating the headers, and then just go on and update them, > without asking for permission?
For pure merges I would think this is the best practice. At least as long as we are on svn. As - if we decide to switch to git - then we might need to set up new rules about committing ... Kai ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Is your legacy SCM system holding you back? Join Perforce May 7 to find out: • 3 signs your SCM is hindering your productivity • Requirements for releasing software faster • Expert tips and advice for migrating your SCM now http://p.sf.net/sfu/perforce _______________________________________________ Mingw-w64-public mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public
