On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 2:37 PM, Ruben Van Boxem <vanboxem.ru...@gmail.com>

> 2014-11-03 10:30 GMT+01:00 Baruch Burstein <bmburst...@gmail.com>:
>> I am curious why only a few of the executables get prefixed versions? I
>> just tried running a certain makefile with prefixed versions of the
>> toolchain, and it failed looking for the prefixed versions of 'ar' and
>> 'windres'. Easily solvable (make a copy and prefix it), but I am still
>> curious why some get it by default while others don't?
> Because this is a native toolchain. Native toolchains don't have
> everything prefixed. Your makefile shouldn't be using any prefixes, and
> just call the bare "gcc" etc. instead.

a. Then why are some prefixed?
b. Is there another way to determine in the makefile if compiling for x64
or x32 without using the compiler executable name?

˙uʍop-ǝpısdn sı ɹoʇıuoɯ ɹnoʎ 'sıɥʇ pɐǝɹ uɐɔ noʎ ɟı
Mingw-w64-public mailing list

Reply via email to