On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 2:37 PM, Ruben Van Boxem <vanboxem.ru...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> 2014-11-03 10:30 GMT+01:00 Baruch Burstein <bmburst...@gmail.com>:
>
>> I am curious why only a few of the executables get prefixed versions? I
>> just tried running a certain makefile with prefixed versions of the
>> toolchain, and it failed looking for the prefixed versions of 'ar' and
>> 'windres'. Easily solvable (make a copy and prefix it), but I am still
>> curious why some get it by default while others don't?
>>
>
> Because this is a native toolchain. Native toolchains don't have
> everything prefixed. Your makefile shouldn't be using any prefixes, and
> just call the bare "gcc" etc. instead.
>

a. Then why are some prefixed?
b. Is there another way to determine in the makefile if compiling for x64
or x32 without using the compiler executable name?


-- 
˙uʍop-ǝpısdn sı ɹoʇıuoɯ ɹnoʎ 'sıɥʇ pɐǝɹ uɐɔ noʎ ɟı
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Mingw-w64-public mailing list
Mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public

Reply via email to