On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 3:45 PM, Baruch Burstein <bmburst...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 2:37 PM, Ruben Van Boxem <vanboxem.ru...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> >> 2014-11-03 10:30 GMT+01:00 Baruch Burstein <bmburst...@gmail.com>: >>> >>> I am curious why only a few of the executables get prefixed versions? I >>> just tried running a certain makefile with prefixed versions of the >>> toolchain, and it failed looking for the prefixed versions of 'ar' and >>> 'windres'. Easily solvable (make a copy and prefix it), but I am still >>> curious why some get it by default while others don't? >> >> >> Because this is a native toolchain. Native toolchains don't have >> everything prefixed. Your makefile shouldn't be using any prefixes, and just >> call the bare "gcc" etc. instead. > > > a. Then why are some prefixed? > b. Is there another way to determine in the makefile if compiling for x64 or > x32 without using the compiler executable name? >
To be pedantic, you'll never be running x32 on Windows: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/X32_ABI > > -- > ˙uʍop-ǝpısdn sı ɹoʇıuoɯ ɹnoʎ 'sıɥʇ pɐǝɹ uɐɔ noʎ ɟı > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Mingw-w64-public mailing list > Mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Mingw-w64-public mailing list Mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public
