Vincent Torri <vincent.to...@gmail.com> writes: >>> Can someone confirm that ? If yes, is it possible to fix this ? >> >> For obtaining reproducible binaries I had to pass --no-insert-timestamp >> to the linker. That was last December, using the MSYS2's MinGW-w64 >> toolchain (32 bits). > > i've just read that this option is not stable > > also, i don't want to remove timestamps, i want the linker to specify > the correct timestamp
My point was that the linker is including the timestamps here, unless I explicitly command it to do otherwise. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now! http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=272487151&iu=/4140 _______________________________________________ Mingw-w64-public mailing list Mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public
