On Sun, Feb 7, 2016 at 6:42 PM, Óscar Fuentes <o...@wanadoo.es> wrote: > Vincent Torri <vincent.to...@gmail.com> > writes: > >>>> Can someone confirm that ? If yes, is it possible to fix this ? >>> >>> For obtaining reproducible binaries I had to pass --no-insert-timestamp >>> to the linker. That was last December, using the MSYS2's MinGW-w64 >>> toolchain (32 bits). >> >> i've just read that this option is not stable >> >> also, i don't want to remove timestamps, i want the linker to specify >> the correct timestamp > > My point was that the linker is including the timestamps here, unless I > explicitly command it to do otherwise.
my point is that the timestamp is incorrect (it is set to 0, which is wrong) Vincent Torri ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now! http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=272487151&iu=/4140 _______________________________________________ Mingw-w64-public mailing list Mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public
