On 7/7/16, dw <[email protected]> wrote: > I was looking to see if there was any more inline asm that could be > removed from mingw-w64. That brought me to vsscanf (and friends). This > looked to be a messy bit of code that could probably use a review. > > As I started looking through it, I found what I believe to be a bunch of > flaws (see > https://codereview.stackexchange.com/questions/133266/turn-a-vsscanf-call-into-a-sscanf-call). > > I started trying to clean it up, but eventually decided that the only > way to really make this 'clean' was to re-write it in pure assembly. > Which I have done. > > I've got a first draft attached. I don't know that this follows > standard mingw-w64 coding conventions, but it follows Windows coding > standards better than the existing code. > > My question is: Now what? > > The patch is written. I've tested it and it looks like it works. Where > do we go from here? > > Comments and advice are welcome. Remember to regen Makefile.in if you > want to build this. > > dw >
There are no patches attached. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Attend Shape: An AT&T Tech Expo July 15-16. Meet us at AT&T Park in San Francisco, CA to explore cutting-edge tech and listen to tech luminaries present their vision of the future. This family event has something for everyone, including kids. Get more information and register today. http://sdm.link/attshape _______________________________________________ Mingw-w64-public mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public
