On 26/03/2021 12:22, Martin Storsjö wrote:
As there's no code that could be using the new UCRT spelling using any
public headers, there's nothing we can try to remain compatible with
in that case, so we'd only be setting new predecent (i.e. if building
with mingw headers, and iff targeting UCRT, then access the field with
a different name).
I.e., I'm a bit hesitant about whether we should be doing this at all,
or if we should follow suit and make it a similar struct containing
only the first member instead?
In my opinion it was the right call by Microsoft to do that, so it would
be nice to follow.
Thanks,
Jacek
_______________________________________________
Mingw-w64-public mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public
