在 2022-10-03 17:37, Martin Storsjö 写道:

I realize I overlooked this part of your reply before; if you're ok with the rest of the patches, I guess it's time to land them.

Do you (or Alvin) have an opinion on the two RFC patches - adding ssp functions for the printf family and gets(), which aren't used yet, and complicating the stack guard initialization, trying to use other APIs than plain rand_s (which would still be referenced as fallback) - should we add them or leave them out for now?


If those aren't necessary for a reason for now, I think we had better leave them out. (I don't mind adding them, though.)



--
Best regards,
LIU Hao

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
Mingw-w64-public mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public

Reply via email to