Is it okay to bump this again? On Wed, Mar 8, 2023 at 11:57 AM Jameson Nash <vtjn...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Alright, let's try that again! > > On Wed, Mar 8, 2023 at 11:54 AM Alvin Wong <al...@alvinhc.com> wrote: > >> Hi, it seems the mailing list software stripped your attached patch. >> Please try resending it with a .txt file extension. (I suspect that >> Gmail doesn't send the .patch files with the MIME type `text/plain`.) >> >> On 7/1/2023 11:10, Jameson Nash wrote: >> > I noticed that gdtoa upstream appeared to have some changes that were >> not >> > reflected here, so I tried to copy them into mingw-w64 here. I had to >> > partly guess at what the diff was between the old and current versions >> > because upstream does not seem to provide version control, so this is a >> bit >> > hard to illustrate. For future reference, this is the content from >> today: >> > >> https://github.com/vtjnash/gdtoa/commit/a37a5e1354210f135003cc734cb097eee48e58b5 >> , >> > which is also included as a tgz in the commit here for future >> reference. I >> > did not import any of the new features (new files) since those are not >> > specified as part of C9x or POSIX, so they did not seem necessary. >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Mingw-w64-public mailing list >> > Mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net >> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public >> > _______________________________________________ Mingw-w64-public mailing list Mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public
