No, I missed your message since I am not on the mailing list itself. Thanks!
Whelp, you apparently found a bug introduced into gdtoa itself, since the same test program run on linux against their current code also fails with the same incorrect byte ordering of the output: gdtoa$ ./a.out got: 1.06074e-314 bits: 000000007ff80000 I am not exactly sure of the intent here (since gdtoa doesn't use any sort of version control), so I have mostly just removed that line of the change. I will send a message to the gdoa developer also, informing him of your finding My test code is attached as a github comment on the same commit attached as a patch here. https://github.com/vtjnash/mingw-w64/commit/561c763593981f7516ab57b0cae974ebdcef4de3#commitcomment-112904299 On Tue, May 9, 2023 at 8:55 AM Jameson Nash <vtjn...@gmail.com> wrote: > Is it okay to bump this again? > > On Wed, Mar 8, 2023 at 11:57 AM Jameson Nash <vtjn...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Alright, let's try that again! >> >> On Wed, Mar 8, 2023 at 11:54 AM Alvin Wong <al...@alvinhc.com> wrote: >> >>> Hi, it seems the mailing list software stripped your attached patch. >>> Please try resending it with a .txt file extension. (I suspect that >>> Gmail doesn't send the .patch files with the MIME type `text/plain`.) >>> >>> On 7/1/2023 11:10, Jameson Nash wrote: >>> > I noticed that gdtoa upstream appeared to have some changes that were >>> not >>> > reflected here, so I tried to copy them into mingw-w64 here. I had to >>> > partly guess at what the diff was between the old and current versions >>> > because upstream does not seem to provide version control, so this is >>> a bit >>> > hard to illustrate. For future reference, this is the content from >>> today: >>> > >>> https://github.com/vtjnash/gdtoa/commit/a37a5e1354210f135003cc734cb097eee48e58b5 >>> , >>> > which is also included as a tgz in the commit here for future >>> reference. I >>> > did not import any of the new features (new files) since those are not >>> > specified as part of C9x or POSIX, so they did not seem necessary. >>> > >>> > _______________________________________________ >>> > Mingw-w64-public mailing list >>> > Mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net >>> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public >>> >> _______________________________________________ Mingw-w64-public mailing list Mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public
