Hi Karan, Take a look at http://www.ipt.etsi.org/knoppix.htm a linux live-cd including MIPL and documentation are available.
> from mobile node > ping6 fec0:106:2700::1 -->works but ping6 fec0:106:2300::2 fails Have you activated the forwarding on HA ? > Problem: I would also like to know should I start mipv6d as > HA or CN on Foreign Agent? I am using HA configuration for the same No, just a router configuration Also, site-local address is deprecated ... try with global address Regards Antoine Boutet -------- Message d'origine-------- De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] de la part de karan mitra Date: ven. 25/08/2006 02:07 À: [email protected]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Objet : [mipl] Testbed issues: Kindly Advice!! Dear all, I am Masters student trying to implement Mobile IPv6 based testbed to study vertical handovers. I am using Suse 9.3 professional as my Linux distribution with MobileIPv6 enabled kernel 2.6.16. The kernel is successfully compilied and is running beautifully on all the machines. The testbed I have created is suffering from some problems which I would like to seek answers ASAP. The testbed is like this ==== MN - ==== === ==-== --- FR------------------------HA/R === ==== 1. I have implemented the Router as well as Home Agent on the same machine. Which has two ports eth0(WLAN) : fec0:106:2700::1/64 eth1(LAN) : fec0:106:2300::2/64 connected to Foreign Network(FR) route entry : ip route add fec0:106:1100::/64 via fec0:106:2300::1(FR) #Home Agent/R mipv6d.conf : NodeConfig HA; Debuglevel 1; Interface "eth0"; ## ## IPsec configuration ## UseMnHaIPsec disabled; ## Key Management Mobility Capability KeyMngMobCapability disabled; IPsecPolicySet { # HomeAgentAddress fec0:106:2700::1; # HomeAddress fec0:106:2700::4/64; # IPsecPolicy Mh UseESP; # IPsecPolicy TunnelMh UseESP; IPsecPolicy Mh UseESP 1 2; # IPsecPolicy ICMP UseESP 5; IPsecPolicy TunnelMh UseESP 3 4; } mipv6d.conf (Mobile Node) Interface "eth0"; #Interface "eth1" { # MnIfPreference 2; #} MnRouterProbes 1; MnHomeLink "eth0" { HomeAgentAddress fec0:106:2700:1; HomeAddress fec0:106:2700::4/64; # address opt. #MnRoPolicy 3ffe:2060:6:1::3 enabled; #MnRoPolicy disabled; } ## ## IPsec configuration ## UseMnHaIPsec disabled; ## Key Management Mobility Capability KeyMngMobCapability disabled; IPsecPolicySet { # HomeAgentAddress fec0:106:2700::1; # HomeAddress fec0:106:2700::4/64; # IPsecPolicy Mh UseESP; # IPsecPolicy TunnelMh UseESP; # IPsecPolicy Mh UseESP 1 2; # IPsecPolicy ICMP UseESP 5; # IPsecPolicy TunnelMh UseESP 3 4; } 2. The mobile node is connected to the HA via WLAN(eth0) with ip address fec0:106:2700::4/64 Ping6 works between these two interfaces and after starting radvd on HA I can get Router Advertisements properly on MN. Problem :But when I try to ping HA/Router from mobile node I cannt ping to it. i,e from mobile node ping6 fec0:106:2700::1 -->works but ping6 fec0:106:2300::2 fails 3. The Foreign Router also has two interfaces : eth0(LAN connected to HA via HUB) fec0:106:2300::1/64. eth2(WLAN): fec0:106:1100::1/64 ip route entry : ip route add fec0:106:2700::/64 via fec0:106:2300::2(HA) Now from FA I can ping to each and every interface accept the mobile node. Problem: I would also like to know should I start mipv6d as HA or CN on Foreign Agent? I am using HA configuration for the same I have also tried to perform handover for which I get the router advertisements successfully but I cannt see any BU being performed on ethereal. Also, I cant see any tunnel being created between HA and MN. Kindly Advise as I have tried my best for past 4-5 days. Thanking You, Regards Karan _______________________________________________ mipl mailing list [email protected] http://www.mobile-ipv6.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mipl _______________________________________________ mipl mailing list [email protected] http://www.mobile-ipv6.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mipl
