On 17 November 2016 at 16:06, Anil Madhavapeddy <[email protected]> wrote: > I also acknowledge that it's a royal pain to build mirage-www locally right > now, so I am working on making it a more lightweight unikernel (by staging > the HTML generation) as part of the MirageOS3 release efforts. More on that > when I have a working patch :) >
That sounds good :) But I'm curious what's a royal pain in the meantime -- just tried, and it seemed to build ok for me against current OPAM remote (ie., no mirage-dev) using local OPAM (though the Docker workflow didn't work so well). -- Richard Mortier [email protected] _______________________________________________ MirageOS-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mirageos-devel
