I think the point is that if you already know what you're doing, it's not so bad. If you're *not* familiar with it, then it can seem fairly complicated compared to other static site generators.
Best wishes, Amir -- Sent via mobile > On 17 Nov 2016, at 16:29, Richard Mortier <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> On 17 November 2016 at 16:06, Anil Madhavapeddy <[email protected]> wrote: >> I also acknowledge that it's a royal pain to build mirage-www locally right >> now, so I am working on making it a more lightweight unikernel (by staging >> the HTML generation) as part of the MirageOS3 release efforts. More on that >> when I have a working patch :) >> > > That sounds good :) > > But I'm curious what's a royal pain in the meantime -- just tried, and > it seemed to build ok for me against current OPAM remote (ie., no > mirage-dev) using local OPAM (though the Docker workflow didn't work > so well). > > -- > Richard Mortier > [email protected] > > _______________________________________________ > MirageOS-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mirageos-devel _______________________________________________ MirageOS-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mirageos-devel
