On Mon, 1 Oct 2001, Tornoci Laszlo wrote: > Lots of people don't comment, because the problem is a long standing one, > and we haven't seen any real reaction from the apache people to the > complaints raised here. It is beyond my understanding, how a very good and > successful open source project with the backing of firms like IBM can show > such a total incompetence in dealing with a mirror structure. > Apache guys! PLEASE DO SOMETHING WITH THE MIRROR STRUCTURE! Don't > start lengthy discussions about what would be the 'optimal' way of > mirroring! Almost anything is better than the current situation!
I wouldn't perhaps put it in quite those words, but you're absolutely right. > Most importantly: HAVE SOMEONE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MIRROR, who is on list > list. That's the most important point, allright. For an example of how it should be done, just look at the Proftpd project. The person responsible for this has done a wonderful job, and has managed to get some 200 mirrors working perfectly. Something wrong with your mirror? You get a mail. The comparison with the Apache project mirroring is just painful. Bert Vermeulen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
