Am 25.01.2011 16:41, schrieb Carlos Carvalho:
Thorsten Guenther ([email protected]) wrote on 25 January 2011 16:20:
>Am 25.01.2011 15:56, schrieb Friedrich Strohmaier:
>>
>>> For sites with less capacity, it might be preferred to keep the ISO
>>> images in a separate subtree, easy to exclude.
>> That sounds reasonable and was what I thought about.
>> Having no clue how it works with mirrorbrain in detail, I'll proceed to
>> change that today. :o))
>>
>Hi!
>
>Perhaps rsync-push should be limited to the core parts (eg. the /stable/
>tree) where simultanous release is an issue. So mirror admins can choose
>to rsync-pull the other trees like /old/ and /DVD/.
>Another solution would be to have differend kinds of "subscriptions" for
>rsync-push, but i guess this would be difficult to handle on the TDF side.
What's this rsync-push about? It has nothing to do with mirroring dvd/cd.
I opted to have the mirror contents pushed to my site via rsync, that
makes it an "rsync-push". Question is what contents should be pushed to
mirrors, eg. should the DVD images be pushed. Until now mirror admins
can´t select what ist pushed.
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to [email protected]
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/mirrors/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
