On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 08:33:27PM +0100, Joerg Jung wrote: > On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 11:11:22AM -0800, Scott Vanderbilt wrote: > > On 1/20/2016 10:44 AM, Jiri Navratil wrote: > > > > >when following OpenBSD -current, I'm getting > > > > > >$ smtpd -h > > >version: OpenSMTPD master > > >usage: smtpd [-dhnv] [-D macro=value] [-f file] [-P system] [-T trace] > > > > > >$ uname -a > > >OpenBSD mymachine 5.9 GENERIC.MP#29 amd64 > > > > > >is the "master" intended ? > > Yes. > > > I'm not sure what the thinking is behind the change (maybe difficulties in > > managing source for opensbd and portable?), but that is correct. > > > > See: > > <http://cvsweb.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/src/usr.sbin/smtpd/smtpd.h.diff?r1=1.507&r2=1.508> > > There was no real release since a while, only snapshots. > > Master is considered the most recent development state, it is the so > called current head. Once a real (stable) release is rolled this will > be changed to some real version number (for the release), afterwards it > will likely be master again. > > IMHO it would be nice to have snapshots date behind the "master" but > that is not worth the effort (for me).
...and on OpenBSD the version does not really matter, because you have the regular release there. AFAIK, no other OpenBSD daemon returns a version, because it is just not needed: "It's the smtpd version of/on OpenBSD 5.9" -- You received this mail because you are subscribed to [email protected] To unsubscribe, send a mail to: [email protected]
