On Sun, Dec 02, 2018 at 07:02:14PM -0600, Edgar Pettijohn wrote:
> I think this was probably an oversight.
>
no, this wasn't an oversight.
the new grammar used TAG, not TAGGED which will be removed
> Index: parse.y
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.sbin/smtpd/parse.y,v
> retrieving revision 1.232
> diff -u -p -u -r1.232 parse.y
> --- parse.y 30 Nov 2018 15:33:40 -0000 1.232
> +++ parse.y 3 Dec 2018 01:00:45 -0000
> @@ -921,7 +921,7 @@ ACTION STRING {
> ;
>
> match_option:
> -negation TAG tables {
> +negation TAGGED tables {
> struct table *t = $3;
>
> if (rule->flag_tag) {
>
> --
> You received this mail because you are subscribed to [email protected]
> To unsubscribe, send a mail to: [email protected]
>
--
Gilles Chehade @poolpOrg
https://www.poolp.org tip me: https://paypal.me/poolpOrg
--
You received this mail because you are subscribed to [email protected]
To unsubscribe, send a mail to: [email protected]
