On Dec 3, 2018 3:57 AM, Gilles Chehade <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Dec 02, 2018 at 07:02:14PM -0600, Edgar Pettijohn wrote:
> > I think this was probably an oversight.
> >
>
> no, this wasn't an oversight.
>
> the new grammar used TAG, not TAGGED which will be removed
>
:( Tagged reads better. No worries though. I saw the TAGGED keyword still there
so I was hoping it was accidental.
>
> > Index: parse.y
> > ===================================================================
> > RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.sbin/smtpd/parse.y,v
> > retrieving revision 1.232
> > diff -u -p -u -r1.232 parse.y
> > --- parse.y 30 Nov 2018 15:33:40 -0000 1.232
> > +++ parse.y 3 Dec 2018 01:00:45 -0000
> > @@ -921,7 +921,7 @@ ACTION STRING {
> > ;
> >
> > match_option:
> > -negation TAG tables {
> > +negation TAGGED tables {
> > struct table *t = $3;
> >
> > if (rule->flag_tag) {
> >
> > --
> > You received this mail because you are subscribed to [email protected]
> > To unsubscribe, send a mail to: [email protected]
> >
>
> --
> Gilles Chehade @poolpOrg
>
> https://www.poolp.org tip me: https://paypal.me/poolpOrg
b��yǢ��m�+&j)[yƮ�쨹���r��y�h�+ ����kiv��N�����r��zǧu���[h�+ ��칻 �&ޢ���kiv��
