from "http://www.cs.usask.ca/staff/oster/raid.html";
" Q Why are kernels with RAIDframe so huge? A RAIDframe is not small. It typically requires at least 500K of extra space [May 24, 2000?: Gee.. this is old too... on i386, I believe the additional space required is only about 320K these days. Feb. 22, 2004: RAIDframe weighs in at 150K for i386]. This makes it tight to get it working on something like a Sun 3/50 (kernels must be less than 1MB in size), but if you're going to be running this on a server, chances are an extra 500K isn't going to be much of a problem. Doing RAID well and with as many options as RAIDframe provides takes a lot of space. I am working on pruning out unnecesary bits from the driver. " is openbsd using this code? On 6/12/05, James Herbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Rob Foster wrote: > > Why is RAIDFrame not in the generic kernel? Is it too big, or buggy? > > It makes the kernel 500K bigger. I think that's in the FAQ somewhere. :) > > > -- > No virus found in this outgoing message. > Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. > Version: 7.0.323 / Virus Database: 267.6.9 - Release Date: 11/06/2005
