[email protected] (Ted Unangst), 2011.02.18 (Fri) 01:27 (CET): > On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 4:52 PM, Dmitrij D. Czarkoff <[email protected]> > wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 11:46:05AM +0000, Stuart Henderson wrote: > >> Perhaps we think that the AP supports wpa2 but it is actually broken > >> and only wpa1 works. > > > > We shouldn't as far as wpaprotos defaults to "wpa1,wpa2", so wpa2 shouldn't > > be > > tested if wpa1 succeeds. > > The man page says the opposite. wpa2 is preferred if both are allowed. > A couple of times when access points claimed to do both wpa1 and wpa2 I had no luck with them using wpa2 - but wpa1 worked like a charm.
- Re: netword's wireless security settings - ho... Stuart Henderson
- Re: netword's wireless security settings - how to dete... frantisek holop
- Re: netword's wireless security settings - how to... Dmitrij D. Czarkoff
- Re: netword's wireless security settings - ho... frantisek holop
- Re: netword's wireless security settings ... Dmitrij D. Czarkoff
- Re: netword's wireless security settings - how to dete... Ted Unangst
- Re: netword's wireless security settings - how to... Dmitrij D. Czarkoff
- Re: netword's wireless security settings - ho... Stuart Henderson
- Re: netword's wireless security settings ... Dmitrij D. Czarkoff
- Re: netword's wireless security setti... Ted Unangst
- Re: netword's wireless security ... MERIGHI Marcus
- Re: netword's wireless security ... Dmitrij D. Czarkoff
- Re: netword's wireless security settings - ho... Joe Snikeris

