On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 7:38 PM, Ted Unangst <t...@tedunangst.com> wrote: > On Tue, Jul 19, 2011, STeve Andre' wrote: >> On 07/19/11 12:27, Ted Unangst wrote: >>> On Tue, Jul 19, 2011, Paul Suh wrote: >>>> On Jul 18, 2011, at 6:24 PM, Ted Unangst wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Mon, Jul 18, 2011, Sergey Bronnikov wrote: >>>>>> may be proper link is http://www.openbsd.org/query-pr.html >>>>> The bug tracker is down and will still that way for some time. >>>> Ted, >>>> >>>> Is there something that we can do to help? >>> Write a bug tracker that doesn't suck. >>> >>> Suggestions about existing bug trackers that don't suck aren't helpful, >>> however, because obviously, if it didn't suck we'd already be using it, >>> ergo it does suck. >>> >> Ted, Is it worth looking at the current system to see if the suck factor >> can be vacuumed from it, or is it a hopeless case in your opinion? > > It is hard to imagine a bug tracker that could actually suck more than > gnats. The current replacement, email bugs@ and search the marc.info > archives, is vastly superior.
Siebel. Trust me, I've helped support open revolts in companies that tried to use it. It's not a likely candidate for UNIX or Linux users of any sort, but lord, it's bad.
