On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 10:35 AM, R0me0 *** <[email protected]> wrote:
> It is a GENERIC kernel, the name is only copy of GENERIC.MP :) . As I said,
> it is a complex setup and I'm planning an upgrade.

Well, you're doing the right thing.  There have been *MANY* fixes to
the network stack since 4.4, so updating to 5.0 as you plan is very
very likely to resolve it.

I'm not sure, though, if you're looking for something besides
encouragement in doing that.  With no information from the crash,
there's no way anyone can say "oh yeah, that was fixed in version
4.x", and even with that information it would just serve to confirm
that you should do what you're already planning on doing and should do
for other reasons.  Even if it was a completely new bug and the crash
trace proved it, the volume of changes in the code between 4.4 and
current is such that reproducing it on a -current setup would be the
first step...

So, are you looking for something else?


Philip Guenther

Reply via email to