On Sun, Apr 08, 2012 at 12:56:52AM +0200, Rimi Philippe wrote:
> Hi Claudio,
> just finished building it all and it seems it works great, very
> impressive. Thank you!
> I'll be running a few tests tomorrow to see if it's stable on the lab,
> I'll keep you posted.
>
> BTW when testing some network statements I think I might have hit a bug.
>
> A.A.A.A is a connected route
> B.B.B.B is a static route (route -T 99 add B.B.B.B/28 3.3.3.3)
>
> Config:
> rdomain 99 {
> rd 1.1.1.1:99
> import-target rt 1.1.1.1:99
> import-target rt 2.2.2.2:99
> export-target rt 1.1.1.1:99
> depend on mpe99
> network A.A.A.A/28
> network B.B.B.B/28
> }
>
>
> With this config, on PE2 I never get any BGP updates for B.B.B.B (even
> though it's marked as announced on PE1).
>
> Now I edit the config :
> network B.B.B.B/28 set nexthop self
> +bgpctl reload
>
> Route is now announced and I get the update on PE2, everything ok.
>
> Any ideas?
>
Please look with bgpctl show fib table 99 and bgpctl show rib VPNv4 if the
prefix is showing up. Because it does work for me (with my very limited
testing).
--
:wq Claudio
