> > > > > When moving these files over via nfs the problem doesn't occur and the > > > > > files are saved correctly on my ffs partition. > > > > > > > > That (or scp) is how I always copied files > > > > from one FS/OS/arch to a completely different FS/OS/arch. > > > > > > > And my point isn't the migration of my data. There is a work-around so I > > > already fixed that. > > > > That's not a workaround. You cannot take a disk holding > > a certain filesystem from a certain OS on a certain architecture, > > put it into a different machine of a different architecture, > > running a different OS, mount it as a different filesystem, > > and just expect it to work. Going through a defined protocol > > such as NFS of SCP is the normal way. > > > This should not be an issue (this is also my response to Rogier). Ext3 > is nothing more than ext2 with extra journaling features enabled,
So in particular, the ext3 inode structure is precisely the ext2 inode structure? > If a filesystem isn't a "defined protocol" then it shouldn't be offered > as a mountable filesystem. Nobody is offering ext3 as a mountable filesystem on OpenBSD.
