On Sun, 27 Nov 2005 01:58:04 +0100, frantisek holop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>hmm, on Sat, Nov 26, 2005 at 09:34:39AM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said that >> Yes, OpenBSD is the _only_ operating system that takes security as >> seriously as it should be taken. Consider the why of OpenBSD's > >this is a silly argument. >of course it is not the only system. don't think nobody else >takes security seriously. maybe you will be surprised, but >even companies like red hat take security seriously. they >are just not that good at it. > >but don't think openbsd invented security. > >"Pride [goeth] before destruction, and an haughty spirit before a fall." > >-f Hi frantisek, It seems you misread Tonys' post, glanced over a few important words and lost the meaning; particularly these words: >> as seriously as it should be taken. Others may claim to take security seriously, and maybe they do in their own way, but when the goal is not reached, then you can conclude they have failed to take their goal seriously enough. JCR
