On 2 June 2014 10:23, Ted Unangst <t...@tedunangst.com> wrote:

> Part of the deprecation / migration process is identifying the weird
> ways people use vnd and finding solutions for them. But as we've seen,
> people never move forward without the occasional push.

So the most appropriate way to use vnd(4) as an encrypted container
going forward would be to lay down softraid(4) CRYPTO inside it to
achieve a like-for-like outcome or would this be over-complicating
things?  I have had success in testing this use case but I am aware it
may not be supported.

Reply via email to