On 19-10-2014 21:01, Ian Grant wrote:
> On the contrary: it_will_  make it impossible for people to know what
> _we_  are doing. This is not one system I'm talking about: it's
> countless independent VPNs. No one person in the world will ever know
> what_we_  are doing.
Except perhaps for the nations with mass surveillance capabilities.
>
> It's not security by obscurity, it's a one-time pre-shared key.
Well, the need for a PSK doesn't change the fact that you're trying to
conceal something, but not making it inherently more secure.
>
> You think someone can analyse all the HTTP traffic in a country? So
> what if they could? By the time they've analysed the dumps the service
> won't be on that host anymore.
In what world do you live? Didn't you followed the news regarding Eduard
Snowden disclosures? Not only it is possible to analyze all HTTP traffic
on any given country, but it's also possible to analyze ALL traffic on
any given country. This is exactly what NSA is doing and perhaps others
also. Hell, even some companies such as akamai and others can see a
great chunk of the internet traffic.
>
> The issue I am addressing is not privacy. You would know that if you
> had read the Foundation paper:
>
>
http://livelogic.blogspot.com/2014/10/the-foundation-parts-iii-iii.html
Yes, you're not addressing *just* privacy. But your original post e-mail
subject of "shadow TCP stacks" is misleading.
> Well, "they" don't have a choice, because OpenBSD is open source, or
> haven't you heard?
Even if you did manage to create a nice patch, bug free, with great
security and all, I don't ever see this getting into the OpenBSD source
tree. And, as Henning, an OpenBSD developer, putted on a reply to you,
you don't get to decide what they put into their source code tree. As I
said before, focus on the proper development of good and strong
cryptography, and you'll sure see your contributions get into OpenBSD,
provided they are in the project's interest, of course.

Cheers

[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type application/pkcs7-signature which 
had a name of smime.p7s]

Reply via email to