frantisek holop said:
> is it true to say then, that ffs is entirely "utf8 safe",
> and/or that ffs is actually "an utf-8 encoded filesystem"
> as IIRC Mac OS is?  or is it some kind of happy accident
> that it works? :)

As I get it, ffs is entirely "utf8 safe" because it is not encoding
aware.  With whatever locale commands

  $ touch `printf "\aabb\bc"`

and

  $ touch `printf "\201\202\203"`

succeed.  (Interestingly, "ls | cat" in presence of filename with ASCII
bell does not actually ring the bell, although backspace works as
expected.)  These octet arrays may happen to be valid utf-8 as well.

-- 
Dmitrij D. Czarkoff

Reply via email to