On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 03:52:32PM +0500, Артур Истомин wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 10:51:38AM +0200, Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado
> wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 05:02:47AM +0500, Артур Истомин wrote:
> > > Is it supported? I mean exactly USB-N10 NANO, not USB-N10
> >
> > Yes.
> >
> > https://wikidevi.com/wiki/ASUS_USB-N10_Nano
> > http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/man.cgi/OpenBSD-current/man4/urtwn.4
>
> Yes, I know that it has chipset supported by OpenBSD. But FreeBSD explicitly
> added support Asus USB-N10 to urtwn(4), driver that exported from OpeBSD.
>
> https://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=revision&revision=264317
>
> As I can say, it is cosmetic changes, but I'm not programmer. Am I right?
FreeBSD's change is not cosmetic. It adds the ID to the driver.
USB-N10 NANO is supported by OpenBSD, look:
$ cd /usr/src/sys/dev/usb
$ ack USB_PRODUCT_ASUS_RTL8192CU_2
if_urtwn.c
75: { USB_VENDOR_ASUS, USB_PRODUCT_ASUS_RTL8192CU_2 },
usbdevs.h
1046:#define USB_PRODUCT_ASUS_RTL8192CU_2 0x17ba /* RTL8192CU */
usbdevs_data.h
1101: USB_VENDOR_ASUS, USB_PRODUCT_ASUS_RTL8192CU_2,
If you get an USB dongle with a different revision (and same chipset),
just send another email to the list with the output of dmesg and
lsusb. The patches adding IDs are pretty simple.
--
Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado http://juanfra.info
